Global Temperature
Graphs: Which is the right one? Part one.
If you see discussions on
global warming, one thing is always present: Temperature graphs in
various shapes and colors, ready to proof the assumption of the
presenter of an idea. But whom to believe? And how - as a
non-scientist - to check if there is something wrong with the data?
One thing is to mention:
Temperatures measured with instrument are available for about 250
years, but only from about 1850 there are enough to get a global
picture. So official graphs start from this date or later.
A good way is to go to
official sources and there are a number of graphs which are
considered as sound. We will check later which one are most common.
If we want to compare
various graphs of temperature or with other data like CO2 or sea ice,
we need a tool to get the whole picture. One of the best and easiest
to handle tools is www.woodfortrees.org. In this tool all relevant
data sets are already included, and you can make very impressive work
with it. Note: This tool and the web site is neutral, not taking a
certain stand in the climate warming discussion.
Just let's go straight to
the website and check the most important temperature graphs:
Here we see three very
common temperature graphs:
Red: HADCRUT 3 from Hadley
Centre combining sea surface and land temperature (air temp 2 meters
above surface)
Pink: Hadcrut trend over
160 years: 0.8°C, which is 0.5 per century and 0.05 per decade.
Green: HADSST 3: sea
surface global temperature
Turquoise: HADSST 3 trend
over 160 years: 0.65°C, which is 0.4 per century
Blue: CRUTEM3 only global
land temperature
Brown: CRUTEM 3 trend over
160 years: 0.95°C, which is 0.6 per century
So why the differences?
Possible answers:
- The ocean temperature is more stable in the long run, so changes are not so easy achieved.
- Temperature stations on land often have been surrounded by cities or human-induced heat, which could have accelerated the recording of the blue CRUTEM curve.
- Remote stations (with few human disturbance) have been abandoned, thus giving more weight to stations near towns.
If someone wishes to
reduce human influences to temperature measurement, sea surface
temperature cold be the choice for long-run observation, especially
as the ocean surface is two third of the earth's surface.
If we take the average
from land and sea, the HADCRUT, we have 0.6°C rise per century.
Added this to the already started century, we would have a
temperature 0.5°C higher than today, which would be no problem then.
So the question is: Is
the global accelerating, or remaining, or declining?
This question we should
look for at a later time. And it will be another chapter in the
Layman's Climate Course
Now back to our Question: What is the right temperature curve?
The answer so far: Land and Sea surface temperature curves differ
from each other. Land temperature seem to show human influence to the
data, whereas sea surface data show a smoothed and delayed record. So
the best seems to stick to the combined global data, which is also
standard in science.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen